Return-path: X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 7997;andrew.cmu.edu;Ted Anderson Received: from beak.andrew.cmu.edu via trymail for +dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl@andrew.cmu.edu (->+dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl) (->ota+space.digests) ID ; Fri, 2 Mar 90 02:37:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <8ZvW-uW00VcJE57E5k@andrew.cmu.edu> Reply-To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU From: space-request+@Andrew.CMU.EDU To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU Date: Fri, 2 Mar 90 02:37:31 -0500 (EST) Subject: SPACE Digest V11 #101 SPACE Digest Volume 11 : Issue 101 Today's Topics: Geosync DSN (was Re: Cheap DSN?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 27 Feb 90 20:12:03 GMT From: bfmny0!tneff@uunet.uu.net (Tom Neff) Subject: Geosync DSN (was Re: Cheap DSN?) It seems to me this is a case where GEO would help. Deploying a few really BIG guidable antenna arrays in geosynchronous orbit, parked over dedicated ground stations, would allow tracking and commanding probes all over the solar system without usurping valuable observatory time. Such big antennae might in principle be useful for radio astronomy too, but in practice you'd only need to build the horns for the bands space probes use, and image resolving ability would not be a priority. This should remove a lot of the lavish expense and operational headaches that would attend an full-fledged orbiting radio telescope. ------------------------------ End of SPACE Digest V11 #101 *******************